Close Menu
    X (Twitter)
    Blockchain Journal
    • News
      • Blockchain News
      • Bitcoin News
      • Ethereum News
      • NFT
      • DeFi News
      • Polkadot News
      • Chainlink News
      • Ripple News
      • Cardano News
      • EOS News
      • Litecoin News
      • Monero News
      • Stellar News
      • Tron News
      • Press Releases
      • Opinion
      • Sponsored
    • Price Analisys
    • Learn Crypto
    • Contact
    • bandera
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Blockchain Journal
    Home » The Mystery of the Dormant Bitcoin Wallets: A 12-Year-Old Transaction

    The Mystery of the Dormant Bitcoin Wallets: A 12-Year-Old Transaction

    0
    By jose on June 26, 2023 Bitcoin News, Cryptocurrencies, News
    Bitcoin Wallets
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    A group of old wallets that were created in 2010 and had not been used for more than 12 years moved 100 bitcoins worth over $3 million for the first time on June 26. This came after another batch of 50 bitcoins from 2010 was spent on June 15, breaking a long period of inactivity.

    Multiple Dormant BTC Wallets Have Come Back To Life This Year

    This year, eight old block rewards from 2010 have been moved for the first time in over 12 years. Btcparser.com, a blockchain parser, detected the movements on Monday, June 26, 2023. The two-block rewards were mined on July 12, 2010, indicating that they belonged to the same person.

    The owner of the first block reward confirmed it at block 795,936 and sent 49 BTC to one address and 0.99 BTC to another. Both addresses are still inactive and have not spent the bitcoin. The second block reward was confirmed at block 795,940 hours later and all the funds went to one address with 49.99 BTC.

    Bitcoin Wallets

    Also, the Bitcoin cash (BCH) corresponding to the old coins has not been transferred and the BCH remains dormant. Interestingly, the first transfer of 50 BTC had very little privacy and scored 10 out of 100 due to three identifiable issues. With a low privacy score, Blockchair.com details that “the issues identified seriously jeopardize the privacy of the parties involved.”

    The second transaction from 2010 was much more private than the first one from 2009, as it got a score of 55 out of 100 by Blockchair’s privacy tool. This score means that the transaction had a “moderate” level of privacy and only one issue was detected. The issue was that the funds were moved from a legacy address to a Segregated Witness (Segwit) address. 

    Segwit is a change in the transaction format of Bitcoin that aims to prevent transaction malleability and increase block capacity by separating the witness data from the input field of the block. Blockchair states that “the issues found are not very serious but they can still be exploited by tracking tools to link transactions.”

    Bitcoin Featured
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    jose

    Related Posts

    Hyperliquid’s USDH stablecoin call sparks fairness and governance debate

    September 5, 20253 Mins Read

    Ethereum ICO whale stakes 150,000 ETH ($646M) after three years of inactivity, reducing supply and signaling confidence

    September 5, 20253 Mins Read

    SharpLink to explore staking part of its $3.6 billion ETH treasury on Linea

    September 5, 20253 Mins Read

    Solana pulls back after profit taking near the $210–$212 barrier

    September 5, 20253 Mins Read

    Ether leads crypto market decline amid ETF outflows, whale accumulation, and regulatory uncertainty

    September 5, 20253 Mins Read

    Strategy Inc.’s path to the S&P 500 faces committee discretion, extreme volatility, and Bitcoin-dependent results

    September 5, 20253 Mins Read

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    © 2025 Blockchain Journal

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.