Close Menu
    X (Twitter)
    Blockchain Journal
    • News
      • Blockchain News
      • Bitcoin News
      • Ethereum News
      • NFT
      • DeFi News
      • Polkadot News
      • Chainlink News
      • Ripple News
      • Cardano News
      • EOS News
      • Litecoin News
      • Monero News
      • Stellar News
      • Tron News
      • Press Releases
      • Opinion
      • Sponsored
    • Price Analisys
    • Learn Crypto
    • Contact
    • bandera
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Blockchain Journal
    Home » New research has questioned the decentralization of 85% of cryptocurrency projects

    New research has questioned the decentralization of 85% of cryptocurrency projects

    0
    By BlockchainJournal on October 18, 2018 News
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    A team of researchers at CryptoCompare has come to the conclusion that developers of 85% of cryptocurrency projects have the ability to make changes to the protocols at their discretion.

    In the Cryptoasset Taxonomy Report published this week, hundreds of cryptoactive assets were analyzed, and a “decentralization thermometer” was used to compile the appropriate classification. The latter pointed to the trend towards centralization of assets, headed by utility-tokens running on monitored servers.

    According to the researchers, 55% of existing assets can be called fully centralized, 30% – half centralized. Only 16% of cryptocurrency projects fell under the classification of decentralized.

    It is possible that in the final figures of CryptoCompare there is a small error, since when added the cumulative sum turns out to be 101%.

    Tokens that were used as a method of payment were called less centralized – 41% of them turned out to be centralized, another 22% were centralized to a certain extent.

    A classification of cryptocurrency assets regarding the presence of securities characteristics was also carried out. For this, analysts have used the recommendations of the Swiss Financial Market Supervision Authority (FINMA).

    According to these criteria, Bitcoin “is almost certainly not a security due to the absence of a single counterparty with which asset holders could associate profit-seeking expectations”. The same assessment was given in relation to the second largest capitalization of the cryptocurrency Ethereum.

    Both of these projects are called decentralized and based on open source principles. However, their share in the total number is only 16%.

    In contrast, centralized projects often depend on a certain central issuer. According to CryptoCompare, 55% of public crypto assets are centralized and, therefore, fall under the definition of a security, thus risking getting into the view of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

    Recall that in August, the Invest in Blockchain portal came to the conclusion that only 40% of the cryptocurrency projects that make up the Top 100 have working products by capitalization of the cryptocurrency projects.

    Subscribe to the BlockchainJournal channel on YouTube !

    << aside id = "unisender_subscribe_form-10" class = "widget unisender_form">

    BlockchainJournal.news

    Bitcoin blockchain ethereum Fall Featured Report SEC
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    BlockchainJournal

    Related Posts

    ARK Invest Unloads Coinbase and GBTC Shares by Millions Amid Market Boom

    December 6, 20232 Mins Read

    GBTC Discount Shrinks as Bitcoin Price Surges

    December 6, 20232 Mins Read

    IBM Introduces OSO, Designed for Cold Storage of Digital Assets

    December 6, 20232 Mins Read

    Marathon Digital Produced 1,187 Bitcoins in November and Held 14,025 Unrestricted BTC

    December 5, 20232 Mins Read

    Volume Counterfeiting Allegations Rock RATS Token on Gate Exchange

    December 5, 20232 Mins Read

    A New Era for Cryptocurrency: Zodia Custody’s Integration with Harmonize

    December 4, 20232 Mins Read

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    © 2025 Blockchain Journal

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.