Marcos Viriato, co-founder and CEO of Parfin, argues that blockchain was born to decentralize power and operate under transparency. However, current digital financial infrastructure risks becoming a political instrument instead of a tool for autonomy. According to the expert, technology will only reach its full potential if it remains neutral, compliant, and globally interoperable at all times. In this way, the focus must return to solving real problems such as efficiency and access.
In recent months, we have seen how digital assets have been integrated into partisan narratives in the UK and the US. For example, the use of crypto for campaign donations has turned innovation into a specific ideological loyalty brand. Therefore, there is a growing tension between the original purpose of decentralization and its institutional use. Likewise, this phenomenon can distort technological progress by making it purely performative for the electorate.
On the other hand, countries like Argentina show massive adoption driven by economic necessity and persistent inflation. Nevertheless, even there, support for certain digital assets has been used as part of governmental political branding recently. Hence, it is imperative that creators and regulators work in parallel to establish clear frameworks and stable rules. Trust in the system depends on building solutions that both banks and users can fully rely on.
Institutional collaboration as the foundation for a resilient economic system
For technology to thrive, institutions must lead with examples of systems that are technically superior and apolitical. Likewise, digital financial infrastructure must not change every time a political narrative in power shifts. On the other hand, cases like Nigeria demonstrate that it is possible to treat blockchain as a national infrastructure for health and education services. In this way, state policy focuses on public utility rather than partisan division.
On the other hand, politicization amplifies fear and creates unnecessary barriers to the development of new financial tools. Therefore, developers must embed compliance and interoperability from the initial stage of creation. Consequently, regulatory frameworks must be adaptive to give innovators the necessary confidence to build responsibly. Only through governance that enables rather than controls can the ecosystem achieve true maturity.
Is it possible to maintain technological neutrality in an increasingly polarized world?
However, the risk of innovation becoming an ideological signal remains a dangerous slippery slope for nations. When support for technology is seen as political loyalty, countries lose sight of the original efficiency goals entirely. Nevertheless, the future of finance will depend on the ability to connect institutions with communities safely and securely. The priority for policymakers must be accountability over media appearance on social media platforms.
Finally, the success of tomorrow’s economy depends on decoupling technology from any restrictive or fleeting ideology. It is expected that digital financial infrastructure will evolve toward a model that prioritizes transparency and user sovereignty. In this way, decentralized systems will be able to form a solid bridge with traditional finance worldwide. The commitment of builders will be to design tools that are easy to understand and use for all of society.
